No one can fail to recognize the challenges this kind of winter storm poses. Crews have been working long shifts around the clock to keep our city moving, and we hope they can soon rest. Neither of us takes their work for granted; it’s incredible that so much clean-up has already been accomplished.
We are writing this morning to ask whether staff can provide us and residents some insight into the prioritization of snow removal. For the past week, we have been the recipients of a high volume of correspondence from residents. Each has a perspective on how prioritization should proceed from their vantage point, according to their own priorities. We know that City staff have a network-wide understanding of how best to accomplish the overall clean-up, but we are not privy to that. We have been unable to provide an explanation to the many notes we’ve received asking why X is proceeding before Y street, and we cannot easily dismiss the concerns expressed.
While snow removal is generally routine, when there is an event like the one we’ve had it has several critical implications. Narrow urban streets make it difficult for transit to serve customers, school pick-up and drop-off become more dangerous, residents lose access to parking space and traffic frustrations can lead to traffic jams and altercations.
When staff are able, we’d be grateful to understand the decisions that prioritize certain streets over others, according to the concerns that we’ve heard.
-
In downtown neighbourhoods, residential removal appears to be de-prioritized vis-à-vis arterials. Downtown residents are the least likely to have private parking spots and the prioritization of streets is an equity issue. How are priorities determined for downtown neighbourhoods with many arterial roads? Residents perceive that low-pressure residential streets further afield from downtown should be deprioritized vis-à-vis quickly completing downtown arterials so that residential removal can proceed more equitably across the city.
-
Why are certain arterial roads cleared before others? It’s Day 10 since the storm and neither Somerset or Gladstone have had snow removed. Both streets are crucial routes for the 11 and 14 buses. It seems to us that it would make sense to clear those streets first, before other wide one-way streets such as Albert or Slater.
- Residents sometime see small streets with few residences receive removal before busier streets that may serve schools, clinics, libraries, or other critical institutions. What consideration is given for removal on streets with a higher demand for parking and drop-off over streets that generally have few pressures? Can streets with schools be prioritized over those that don’t?
- In a neighbourhood such as Hintonburg, removals on residential streets proceeded while high-volume transit and emergency routes such as Wellington or Holland were heavily restricted by parked cars and snowbanks. Why do residential removals continue when highly constrained spine routes are dangerously jammed?
-
How does the City determine when to implement parking bans where there is a high incidence of improperly parked vehicles impeding road access?
We recognize that some of these resident concerns may be contradictory. Residents, however, don’t have the overall picture of what the City’s priorities are for snow removal and how operational decisions are made. During an extreme weather event, residents are told that they cannot report snow clearing concerns to 311, so councillors’ offices have been inundated with complaints and questions to which we have no answers. We’d be grateful for as full an understanding as you can convey.
Again, thanks to the work your crews have been doing. No matter the reasons they’re sent to one street versus another, we are thankful for the many hours they’ve put in with more still to come, and we absolutely recognize the importance that good management has played in getting us to this point.
At least we’re not Toronto, right?
Thanks in advance for your reply